Lamorinda Home Sales — Common Mistakes When Selling a Home

5 01 2012

As we start the year, we’ll also be heading closer to the prime selling season of the year in Lamorinda real estate, and working with our seller clients in preparing their homes for sale.  Most of our clients are wonderful, reasonable people who make the psychological shift from “living” in their home to “merchandising” it for sale.  There is a distinct difference.  Very few of us “live” in our homes in a manner consistent with optimizing its opportunity to be sold for the highest price available in the market.  That requires presenting it as a product that appeals to the broadest possible segment of buyers.

I attended graduate school in business more years ago than I’d care to admit, but the person synonymous with marketing back then still lives on as the present day authority… Dr. Phillip Kotler of the Kellogg School of Management.  Considered to be the “guru” of modern marketing, Dr. Kotler is famous for his “4 P’s of Marketing” — the only four variables that can be controlled when bringing a product to market:

1) Product – What is presented to the market.

2) Price –  It’s price point.

3) Promotion – How it is promoted in the marketplace.

4) Place –  Where it is brought to market.

Ultimately, the seller of a property has the final control over 2 or 3 of the 4P’s… product, price, and place.  This leaves promotion in the hands of their selected real estate agent.  A quality agent will also be highly involved in helping to “shape” the home (product) prior to it going on-market, but only to the extent that the seller cooperates in the process.

The following are the most common mistakes we see sellers make when putting their home on the market:

1.  “The Stalker”:  This is seller that believes that he/she is the best spokesperson for their home, and therefore follows other agents and their buyers around the home when it is being shown — trying to “sell” them on it throughout their visit.  Yes, believe it or not, this happens here in Lamorinda!  Nothing turns a prospective buyer off more than this behavior, and it inevitably leads to the buyer and their agent becoming very uncomfortable — leaving the home as quickly as possible.  The best advice is to take a walk, go shopping or visit a neighbor… and, give the buyers space to mentally “move into” your home.

2.  “I just want to ‘test’ the market”:  This is akin to being partially pregnant.  Either you are on the market with the intention of selling or you should be waiting until you are truly ready to engage in the process.  ”Testing” the market at an unrealistic price point serves no real purpose.  Today’s buyers are highly informed, and no one in this market will over-pay for a home.

3.  ”I’m waiting for the one ‘right’ buyer” :  Most agents have heard this comment at least once per selling season, and its usually emanates from the seller who thinks that their home is worth more than the market suggests, or doesn’t adequately prepare the home for market because they believe that the “one right buyer” will overlook its flaws, cluttered rooms, etc.  Rarely is there the “one right buyer” who will make an offer on a significantly over-priced home, or want a home that the majority of the market chooses not to purchase.  The best advice is to prepare your home for market in a manner that will have it appeal to the broadest possible base of potential buyers.

4. “If I price my house closer to market, I’m afraid I’ll get ‘low-balled’”:  If the feedback from showings of your home is that its “over-priced”,  then the above concern seems a bit illogical.  As a seller, you WANT an offer.  You can always counter it, say “no” to it, or even ignore it.  Assuming that there aren’t other corrective actions you can take to make your home more appealing, addressing a clear over-pricing issue is the most logical move.  Studies have clearly demonstrated that a home that is properly priced from the beginning will sell faster and for more money than one that is initially over-priced.

5.  “My home doesn’t need to be staged.  It wasn’t staged 30 years ago when I bought it!”  Times have changed, and it’s important to make the psychological break from “living” in your home to “selling” your home.  Once it’s on the market, it becomes a product, so why not make it as appealing to buyers as possible?!  The incremental investment for staging will yield a positive return in the increased appeal of your home to potential buyers and the shorter market time.  Remember, the longer a home is on the market, the more the market discounts it.  At a certain point, buyers and agents begin to wonder “what’s wrong” with the home, and showings dramatically drop off.





Market-based Pricing in Lamorinda?

4 02 2011

With the market stalled as the country slows to a crawl for Super Bowl Weekend, I was beginning to grow weary of writing about the market and trying to provide more educated guesses about what might lie ahead for 2011.  Sure, there might be another update to the S&P Case-Schiller Index, but who cares right now.  The Steelers and Packers clash on Sunday afternoon TV, and that seems to be what is consuming the attention of most home buyers and sellers these days.  Alas, it’ll be game-on for the 2011 real estate season starting Monday!

I’ve written before about the challenges of advising a seller on a listing price in a market dominated by rapidly changing economic conditions and areas of non-conforming homes.  The Lamorinda real estate market is dominated by “non-conforming” areas… where a $1M home might be right next door to a 7000 sq. foot estate.  It was challenging when the market was rocketing upward, and it’s been challenging taking the ride down.  From the buyer’s perspective, they also find the market difficult to assess.  Last week, I had a buyer ask me to try to explain to them why two similarly sized homes in the same Orinda neighborhood were listed with differences of about $200+ per square foot.  There wasn’t a rational explanation to be had, other than the fact that clearly the person who priced their house at $700+ per square foot either wasn’t serious about selling, had an overly inflated sense of their home’s worth, or perhaps they received some faulty pricing advice from their real estate agent.

These buyer and seller issues give rise to the question about whether our present system of pricing makes sense in today’s market place.  Historically, sellers set the listing price, but there is often no objective pricing methodology.  Appraisers pretend to use objective methodology, but it’s highly subjective and fraught with problems.  In reality, only markets determine price.  The current system can be confusing to buyer and sellers, and often causes “log jams” in the market, as well as frustration when a property is grossly over-priced.  It also encourages some real estate agents to try and “buy” listings by telling their prospective client that a home is worth more than it really is.  That feels good to the seller and they often reward the unscrupulous agent with the listing. There used to be a well-known Lamorinda real estate agent who was notorious for doing this.  She’d take the listing at an inflated price, and then would be so bold as to solicit pricing input from other agents on the day that the home went on the MLS Brokers Tour! Maybe there’s a better market process.  By the way, any Lamorinda real estate agent who has been active in the business for more than 5 years knows exactly who I’m talking about, and is probably laughing as they read this post.

In Australia, homes are often auctioned off through a process that offers prospective buyers a prolonged period to view the home, and then submit an offer at the prescribed due date or before.  The seller has a “reserve price” which represents the minimum that he/she will accept for the home, but it is unknown to prospective buyers.  The Australian auction process allows the market to determine the price and it creates a sense of urgency for buyers.

Liberally borrowing from the Australian auction process, there is an agent in Boca Raton, FL that has registered a trademark for a “name your price” system of “public pricing”. From what I’ve been able to determine, it’s basically very similar to the Australian auction.  He has another variation of it that allows the public to weigh-in on value by submitting their estimates during the prescribed 6 week marketing period.  So, imagine going to an open house and being asked to submit your estimate of value to the listing agent!  At the prescribed review time, the offers (via letter of intent) and public estimates of value are submitted to the seller.  The seller then decides what buyer he/she wants to work with and at what price.  I can see problems with this process that aren’t inherent in the Australian system.

So… food for thought, but don’t expect any dramatic changes in the immediate future. The real estate industry has not been known for its rapid embrace of technology or change.  In the meantime, we’ll work through the pricing challenges together in 2011.








Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.